.webp)


This is where Speel fundamentally differs. Our AI actors don't just talk at the camera - they hold your product, point to features, demonstrate usage, and move their hands naturally around it. This isn't a static image overlay; it's realistic product interaction that makes the video feel like authentic UGC.
Arcads offers an "unbox POV" feature which simulates the unboxing experience, but doesn't provide the same level of versatile product-holding capability. For e-commerce brands, skincare companies, supplement sellers, or any DTC product - the ability to show an AI creator actually holding your bottle, box, or device is the difference between a video that converts and one that feels flat.
Why it matters: When someone scrolls TikTok or Reels, they expect to see creators holding products. A talking head alone doesn't cut it. Speel's product-holding feature is what makes these videos scroll-stopping and conversion-ready.
Let's do the math:
Speel Starter: $49/month = 27 videos = $1.81 per videoArcads Starter: €100/month (~$109 USD) = 10 videos = $10.90 per video
That's a 6x cost difference per video. For any marketing team testing multiple ad hooks, this isn't trivial, it's the difference between testing 3 variants vs 18 variants for the same budget.
Speel Pro: $99/month = 80 videos = $0.99 per videoArcads Creator: $220/month = 20 videos = $11 per video
At the Pro/Creator level, Speel gives you 4x more videos for ~1/3 the cost. Even our Scale plan ($149/month for 160 videos = $0.93 per video) gives you more content output than Arcads' Creator plan for significantly less.
Traditional UGC costs $150-$500 per video. Both platforms save you money versus hiring creators. But only Speel lets you produce creative variations at true scale without requiring enterprise budgets.
Speel includes an AI script generator that creates scroll-stopping hooks and high-converting ad scripts tailored to your product, offer, and audience. This is integrated directly into the workflow: type your product details → get professionally crafted scripts → generate video.
Arcads doesn't have built-in script generation. You'll need to bring your own scripts or use external tools like ChatGPT, which adds friction to the creative process. When you're testing 10 different hooks for an ad, having script generation built-in saves hours of copywriting time.
This gap extends to video editing too: Arcads delivers a clean talking-head clip, but you can't add text overlays, captions, background music, or B-roll inside the platform. You'll need to use CapCut, Premiere, or pay for their optional editing service. Speel gives you a complete, ready-to-publish video without external tools.
Speel uses a credit-based system where different video types cost different amounts of credits. This means you can allocate your monthly credits however you need—more videos this month, fewer next month, a mix of product-holding and talking-head videos, plus AI-generated images included in every plan.
Arcads uses a fixed monthly subscription with set video limits per tier. 10 videos on Starter, 20 on Creator. That's it. If you need 15 videos one month and 5 the next, you're paying for 20 both months. No flexibility.
Plus, Speel offers a 1-day free trial on all plans: Starter, Pro, and Scale. You can test the product-holding feature, try different actors, generate real videos, and see if it fits your workflow before spending a dollar.
Arcads doesn't publicly offer a free trial. No trial means you're committing €100+ ($109 USD) upfront to see if the platform works for you. That's a meaningful barrier for any team evaluating new tools.
Credit-based pricing + free trial = you stay in control.
Speel's entire workflow is optimized for product showcase UGC: upload product image → AI actor holds it → generate social-ready content. The interface, features, and actor library are all designed around creating authentic product videos that perform on TikTok, Reels, and Meta ads.
Our AI-powered skin enhancer smooths imperfections while keeping real texture and tone, no plastic or overdone effects. This fixes the "uncanny valley" look that plagues other AI-generated content.
Arcads positions itself more broadly as a platform for "performance marketing" and "bulk ad generation." Their massive actor library (1,000+ on Custom tiers) is impressive for volume, but the product-first workflow isn't as streamlined.
The scenario: You're a skincare brand launching a new serum. You need 10 variants of an AI creator holding the bottle, pointing to the ingredients list, and explaining the benefits in a natural, influencer-style way. Speel is built for exactly this use case. Arcads can make talking-head ads at scale, but the product-first workflow isn't as streamlined.
We're biased toward Speel, but we're not going to pretend Arcads doesn't have legitimate use cases:
Choose Arcads if you:
The reality: Most teams, whether you're a startup founder or running campaigns for an enterprise brand, don't need 1,000 actors, immediate API access, or €100-$220/month entry pricing for limited video output. They need affordable, realistic product videos at scale. That's Speel's entire reason for existing.
Here's what we suggest: Take Speel's 1-day free trial on any plan. Upload your product image, generate 2-3 videos with different actors, see the product-holding feature in action, and decide if it delivers the authenticity your ads need.
If it doesn't fit, you've lost nothing. If it does? You just unlocked 99% cost savings on UGC production and rapid turnaround times.
→ Start your free trial at speel.co
.webp)
.webp)

Both platforms produce high-quality AI-generated UGC videos. Speel has been specifically praised in customer reviews for its realism: "Most realistic AI UGC compared to competitors" and "Nothing comes close to Speel right now. Total cheat code for ads."
The key difference is context of use: Speel's product-holding capability creates a more authentic product showcase experience. Arcads focuses on bulk volume with their massive actor library.
For product-centric e-commerce UGC, Speel's realism in product interaction gives it the edge. For high-volume talking-head ad variations, both platforms perform well.
Speel: Credit-based subscription starting at $49/month for 27 videos ($1.81/video). As you scale up, cost-per-video drops to $0.93-$0.99.
Arcads: Monthly subscription starting at €100/month (~$109 USD) for 10 videos ($10.90/video). Creator plan is $220/month for 20 videos ($11/video).
In practice: If you're testing 20-30 ad variations per month (standard for performance marketing), Speel's $49-$79 plans give you that capacity. On Arcads, you'd need the $220/month Creator plan to hit 20 videos and you still wouldn't reach 30.
The verdict: Speel offers significantly better cost-per-video at every tier, which matters tremendously for teams running continuous creative testing.
Speel: Yes, fully. Product-holding is a core feature. AI actors can hold, point to, and demonstrate products with realistic hand movements. Upload your product image and it's integrated into the video naturally.
Arcads: Limited. Arcads has an "unbox POV" feature that simulates unboxing experiences, but doesn't offer the same versatile product-holding capability that Speel provides.
Why it matters: For DTC brands, the ability to show an AI creator physically holding your product (like a real UGC creator would) is often the difference between a video that converts and one that doesn't. Product-holding = authenticity = trust = conversions.
Speel: Yes 1-day free trial on all plans (Starter, Pro, Scale). Try the product-holding feature, test actors, generate real videos before paying.
Arcads: No public free trial mentioned. You're committing to a paid plan upfront.
The takeaway: Free trials eliminate risk. Test Speel's product-holding feature yourself to see if it delivers the authenticity your ads need.
Arcads: 1,000+ AI actors (on Custom tier with variable pricing).
Speel: 100+ photoreal AI actors (all plans).
Our take: More isn't always better. Having 100+ diverse, curated actors gives you options without decision paralysis. When you're testing ads, you need 3-5 strong actors who match your audience not 1,000 to scroll through.
Plus, Arcads' full actor library is restricted to their Custom enterprise tier. Speel's 100+ actors are available across all plans.
Speel: Custom face upload available create brand-specific avatars or use your founder's face.
Arcads: Custom actor cloning available on Custom tier only (higher-priced, variable pricing).
Both platforms support customization, but Speel makes it accessible at lower pricing tiers.
Tie. Both platforms support 30+ languages with localized lipsync:
If international expansion is your goal, both tools can handle it. Your decision should come down to product-holding capability and pricing.
Yes and here's the math:
Traditional UGC creators charge $150-$500 per video (Fiverr, Upwork, influencer networks). Average: $300/video.
Speel pricing: $0.93-$1.81 per video depending on plan.
Savings calculation:
$300 (traditional) - $1.81 (Speel) = $298.19 saved per video
($298.19 / $300) × 100 = 99.4% cost reduction
Even at our highest per-video rate ($1.81), you're saving 99%+ compared to hiring creators. Plus, you get rapid turnaround instead of days or weeks of waiting.
Choose Speel if you're:
The reality: Most teams whether you're a startup founder or running campaigns for an enterprise brand—don't need 1,000 actors, immediate API access, or €100-$220/month entry pricing for limited video output. They need affordable, realistic product videos at scale. That's Speel's entire reason for existing.